![]() ![]() Even if you were reading 3000Mbps on some synthetic benchmark, in real world use, you still wouldn't ever come anywhere near that kind of speed unless you were reading one huge file, only, or moving files from NVME to NVME and probably not even then unless, again, it was like one huge installer file or something. As the above post says run the crystalmark. So the fact that both those drives are reading at "only" around 1800Mbps is actually not something that is all that important. Samsung 92 Random Read at QD1 Meaning you should be seeing at least a 50 increase in speed/responsiveness as a worst case scenario. Under most light usage workloads, a user might never notice the new part numbers lower performancebecause like nearly all modern SSDs, the 970 Evo Plus features a SLC write cache thats much. Now, this post is generally just to help alot of People that buy one of those ssds, since many just put them into their pc, install windows and roll out. Samsung 960 EVO 250GB (Firmware 2B7QCXE7 - Latest) Here are my results: (1 Thread Sequential, 1 Thread 4K) (8 Threads Sequential, 8 Threads 4K) (1 Thread Sequential, 4 Threads 4K) Hope that helps level 1 JocPro R9 5900X + MSI B450 GPC AC + G. Typically around 300-500Mbps, if you're lucky. For every Samsung 950/960/970/EVO/PRO User, your m2 ssd is probaly running worse then it could. The optiplex 3060 have a newer chipset (H370) - the NVME PCIe 3.0x4 is also listed in the OPTIPLEX 3060 manual. I've seen a lot of posts lately about 960 EVO compatibility issues, and switching to a different NVMe SSD made everything better. It will almost always be random reads and writes of substantially smaller groups of files, which normally will probably max you out at speeds not much different than standard SATA SSD speeds. In Work We have DELL Optiplex 3050 (B250 chipset) and SSD Samsung 960 EVO and the speed is 3200 MB / s (PCIe 3.0 x 4). For actual, real world use, 99% of what you do will not be sequential large file reads or writes. what are acceptable temps for a m.2 samsung 960 evo. The ONLY time you are EVER going to see those kinds of "theoretical" speeds is when running benchmarks OR possibly on a desktop when transferring files from NVME to NVME drive, or when reading one huge single file. This is an excellent result which ranks the Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB near the top of the comparison list. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. The Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB averaged 113.4 higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. 67,027,789 SSDs Free Download YouTube Welcome to our 2.5' and M.2 SSD comparison. I doubt you are doing anything wrong, and in reality it is a solution in search of a problem because in real world usage you are NEVER going to see those kinds of speeds anyhow. UserBenchmark Speed test your SSD in less than a minute. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |